The engineering behind AI agents that actually ship.

From “should we build this” to “why is it failing in production”. The full agent stack: strategy, architecture, evals, implementation, ops.

Share your workflow, current stage, and the failure that worries you most.

The four decisions behind every useful agent

A useful agent is a workflow,
not just an LLM.

Fit

Should this be an agent, a copilot, an automation, or a human workflow?

Boundary

What can it read, remember, write, or execute?

Proof

What evals, tests, traces, and reviews show that it works?

Launch

What must be true before this touches production?

Where are you now?

Where you are now.

Before you build

You don’t know where to start. The workflow exists, the agent question is open.

Agent Opportunity Review

Outcome: a clear next step. What to build, what to skip, what shape it takes.

Review the workflow

Prototype exists

It works in demos. Reliability, tool use, memory, or retrieval behavior is unclear.

Agent Readiness Sprint

Outcome: architecture, tool boundaries, eval plan, and a roadmap.

Assess the prototype

Before launch

The agent is about to touch real users, customer data, or internal tools.

Production Readiness Audit

Outcome: launch blockers, eval gaps, observability gaps. Plus a go/no-go call.

Find launch blockers

Known gaps

You know you need evals, traces, regression tests, guardrails, or operational checks.

Hardening Sprint

Outcome: eval harnesses, regression tests, traces, and guardrails. In your codebase.

Harden the system

What the work looks like

Across the whole stack. Strategy to launch ops, every layer between.

Strategy
The agent-or-automation call, scope, and boundaries. With reasoning, not slides.
Architecture
Runtime, memory, retrieval, and tool interfaces. Written down for your team to own.
Evals
Ground-truth sets, regression runners, drift checks. Committed to your codebase.
Implementation
The harnesses, tracing, and guardrails built into the codebase you ship.
Red teaming
Prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool misuse. Adversarial scenarios run and documented.
Stress testing
Load and concurrency against the runtime. Race conditions, retry storms, scale failure.
Audits
Structured review of an existing agent. Gaps, blockers, risk, with a go/no-go.
Launch ops
Observability, rollback paths, runbooks. The work that decides whether launch survives.

Common problems we catch

These are the patterns we look for first.

Workflow, not agent

The system should be a workflow, not an agent.

Tool over-permission

Tool permissions are broader than the agent’s reliability.

Demo retrieval

Retrieval works in demos but fails on edge cases.

Memory misuse

Memory stores the wrong information or persists too much.

Prompt-only tests

The team tests prompts, not full agent trajectories.

Late-stage approval

Human approval happens after the dangerous step.

Start here

Book a 30-minute call.

No deck. No NDA. No paperwork.

Bring the workflow, a prototype, the failure that worries you most, or just the question. Walk away with a yes-or-no on the agent. A yes-or-no on us.